National Report Card

The CSMLS provides, collects and reports data on the examination performance for accredited medical laboratory programs in Canada. The report specifies how many candidates from each program challenged the CSMLS certification examination and the pass rate (the percentage of candidates that passed the exam) for each individual program.

The purpose in releasing this data is two-fold:

  1. To strengthen CSMLS’s accountability to the membership and to other key stakeholders for the certification programs for which the CSMLS is wholly responsible.
  2. To provide a tool for education programs to monitor and analyze the impact of program change when compared to their peer group, as well as a resource when working with administration and government to address future program change.

In compliance with federal privacy laws, the information is provided in aggregate form and does not include any identifying information of individual examination candidates. Only programs with 5 candidates or more in a given exam session are included in the National Report Card.

In order to provide valid comparisons of graduates from EQual™ accredited Canadian training programs, the report only includes performance data of first-time examination candidates. It does not include any supplemental exam candidates’ results, or data from other exam candidates, such as bridging programs or prior learning assessment eligibility. For this information, please scroll to table at the bottom of this webpage.

This report contains exam performance data from the last three sessions.

Looking for previous years? Check out the National Report Card Archives

Select Profession:

Select Year:

Latest Session Chart

Year Average Chart

All Data Average Chart

Required Score to Pass [Angoff]

  
Required Score to Pass [Angoff]

 

National Report Card

Legend:
[Institution Number] Institution
Pass Rate (Passes / Attempts)
NR = Not Reportable: Training programs with less than five (5) exam candidates attending an exam session will not be reported; the data is not statistically significant.
NC = No Candidates: Training program did not have any candidates challenge this exam session (information available since 2017).

 

 

Exam Performance – 5 year aggregate pass rate,
all PLA attempts and EQual accredited program second and third attempts

Candidate Grouping 2025 2024 2023 2022 2021
PLA General MLT Attempts
MLTG PLA first attempt (00) 51.20% (132 / 258) 57.5% (104 / 181) 52.6% (83 / 158) 46.7% (50 / 107) 59.5% (44 / 74)
MLTG PLA second/third (98) 39.80% (51 / 128) 44.6% (45 / 101) 41.9% (36 / 86) 37.2% (29 / 78) 44.1% (30 / 68)
General MLT Program Attempts
MLTG program second/third (99) 54.50% (48 / 88) 50.0% (49 / 98) 54.2% (52 / 96) 44.4% (40 / 90) 53.0% (35 / 66)
PLA MLA Attempts
MLA PLA first attempt (00) 89.80% (149 / 166) 83.7% (87 / 104) 83.3% (60 / 72) 77.2% (44 / 57) 76.1% (35 / 46)
MLA PLA second/third (98) 61.90% (13 / 21) 75.0% (9 / 12) 75.0% (3 / 4) 50.0% (3 / 6) 88.9% (8 / 9)
MLA Program Attempts
MLA program second / third (99) 44.20% (19 / 43) 53.6% (30 / 56) 43.2% (16 / 37) 50.0% (23 / 46) 58.3% (28 / 48)